I'm David Friedman, a professional photographer who sometimes gets ideas for photos, designs, gadgets, and other projects. I write about it all on this blog. You can find the meaning behind the name “Ironic Sans” back in the very first post.
Likely Media
When I'm not writing the blog, I make a living as a photographer and filmmaker. This is my business website.
Sunday Magazine
At this site, I republish the most interesting articles from the New York Times Sunday Magazine exactly 100 years ago each week, along with some commentary or context.
You are reading an entry from the Ironic Sans archive. This entry was posted on July 9, 2009 and is filed under
Art,
Esoteric Comic.
60 Seconds
Advertising
Animated Manhattan
Art
Business
Critical Thinking
Design
Education
Entertainment
Esoteric Comic
Favorites
Games
General
Ideas
Interview
Language
Lists
Long
Music
New York
Pareidolia
Photography
Politics
Science
Star Wars
Technology
Travel
Tree
You Made It
Behind The Post
May 2014
March 2014
February 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
July 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
Twitter: @ironicsans
Google+
ATOM | RSS
[What is this?]
Posted by David at 7:26 AM | Permalink
Filed under:
Art
|
Esoteric Comic
Return to Main Page
This site is © David Friedman and except for fair use it may not be reproduced without my permission. Luckily, permission is usually easy to obtain. Contact me and we'll talk. This blog is typeset in Georgia, Times New Roman, or Times, in that order of priority based on what fonts are installed on your computer, or whatever standard serif font is installed if none of the above. The exceptions are the main title, which is based roughly on Baskerville Old Face, and the handwritten parts which are, well, my handwriting.
Comments
I have a long record of posting positive comments, most of which praise your ideas… this one, not so much. I like the concept of esoteric comics, but not this particular comic for its debut as I think this is really just a visual pun. Kind of like those visual word puzzles, for example:
|READ| = Read between the lines
Anyone know what those puzzles are called? Do they have a specific name?
Posted by: Mr. Wisdumb | July 9, 2009 9:52 AM
Mr. Wisdumb: A “rebus,” perhaps? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebus
Posted by: Felix C | July 9, 2009 10:17 AM
Haha whatever Mr. Wisdumb, I laughed. Good comic!
Posted by: Alex | July 9, 2009 10:30 AM
So bad it belongs in the New Yorker.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 9, 2009 2:26 PM
Felix… thanks, but I don’t think that is right. However, after following your link, I finally came across this site that calls them Word Winks, which they say are also called Plexers, Thinklers, Frame Games. I have never heard of any of those names, but the site does show what I remember as a kid.
Posted by: Mr. Wisdumb | July 9, 2009 5:49 PM
I think it’s great.
You guys keep searching for a classification for this joke while I file it right here under ‘Awesome Dad-joke’.
Posted by: jhcrow | July 9, 2009 8:09 PM
That metaphor made me simile.
Posted by: justin | July 10, 2009 2:02 AM
It would’ve been better if the big four was composed of only four small fours.
Posted by: Andrew | July 10, 2009 9:26 AM
Hey dude, pretty nice blog you got here. I had to laugh so much man :)
Keep on writing!
Greetings from Germany,
Tom
Posted by: Germanguy | July 11, 2009 7:22 PM
This is great. Maybe some of the above negative comments missed the extra joke. :)
Posted by: Carl | July 13, 2009 9:14 PM
The day after this post, Richard Wiseman proposed this visual exercise: http://59seconds.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/which-letter-do-you-see-first/
Posted by: Ferran Alvarez | July 14, 2009 3:38 AM
looks more like a “meta-four” to me
Posted by: david | August 11, 2009 8:05 PM
Well I like it anyway… but then I think puns rule.
psych nerds like me will also note that this is a “Navon Figure” - see David Navon’s (1977) Study of Global vs. Local Perceptual Processing
Posted by: Anonymous | September 17, 2009 8:35 AM
Thanks for explaining that joke for those of us who can’t handle punnery, David.
This comic is my new desktop background; love it!
Posted by: Nikk | November 23, 2009 5:16 PM
c00l meta-Four… :P
Posted by: Praveen Sawh | November 23, 2009 6:32 PM
meta-4’s… hahahaha
I had to think for a moment and this was actually quite genius. I agree, some of the negative people above really missed the point; it was really funny.
Posted by: Chris | December 8, 2009 12:33 PM